Note: Tax doubled ($10 → $20) but DWL quadrupled ($12.50 → $50). This is the T² relationship.
Question e
In the gasoline market, if the tax were raised from $10 to $30 per unit, how many times larger would the DWL be compared to the $10 tax?
Hint
DWL ∝ T². If tax triples (from $10 to $30), how does T² change? Compute (30)² / (10)².
Explanation
DWL ∝ T². Tripling the tax (10 → 30) means DWL changes by a factor of (30/10)² = 3² = 9.
Verify directly: At T = $30, QT = (40−30)/4 = 2.5. DWL = ½ × $30 × (10−2.5) = ½ × $30 × 7.5 = $112.50. Original DWL = $12.50. Ratio: $112.50 / $12.50 = 9×.
Part 2
Multiple Choice
Figure 8-1 — Tax Wedge Diagram
Question 1
Refer to Figure 8-1. When the government imposes the tax, consumer surplus equals
Hint
After the tax, buyers pay Pb. Consumer surplus is the area above Pb and below the demand curve. Which labeled area sits above Pb?
Explanation
Consumer surplus after the tax is the triangle above the buyer price Pb and below the demand curve, from Q = 0 to QT. That's only area A. Areas B and D are between Pb and Ps (they became tax revenue). Areas C and E are the deadweight loss.
Question 2
Refer to Figure 8-1. The deadweight loss from the tax equals
Hint
Deadweight loss is the value of trades that would have occurred without the tax but don't occur with it. These units are between QT and Q*. Look for triangles on the right side.
Explanation
DWL = C + E. These are the two triangles to the right of QT and to the left of Q*. Area C is the lost consumer surplus from units QT to Q*, and area E is the lost producer surplus from those same units. Together they form the DWL triangle. Areas B and D are tax revenue (transferred to the government, not lost).
Question 3
Refer to Figure 8-1. Tax revenue collected by the government equals
Hint
Tax revenue = tax per unit × quantity traded. On the diagram, that's the rectangle between Pb and Ps, from Q = 0 to QT.
Explanation
Tax revenue = T × QT = (Pb − Ps) × QT = the rectangle between Pb and Ps from 0 to QT. That's B + D. Area B was formerly consumer surplus (buyers now pay more), and area D was formerly producer surplus (sellers now receive less). Both flow to the government as tax revenue.
Question 4
If the demand for gasoline is very inelastic (people need it regardless of price), a given tax will generate
Hint
Inelastic demand means quantity barely changes when price rises. If quantity barely falls, what happens to tax revenue (T×Q) and DWL (½T×ΔQ)?
Explanation
With inelastic demand, buyers continue purchasing nearly the same quantity even after the tax. So ΔQ is small, making DWL small (½T×ΔQ is small). But since quantity barely falls, tax revenue (T × Q) remains large. Inelastic goods are attractive tax targets: high revenue, low efficiency cost. This is why governments tax necessities like gasoline, cigarettes, and alcohol.
Question 5
Which of the following correctly describes the Laffer curve insight as it relates to tax revenue?
Hint
What happens to quantity traded as the tax gets very large? If Q → 0, what happens to revenue = T × Q?
Explanation
As the tax increases, two opposing forces act on revenue: a higher T raises revenue, but a falling Q lowers it. At very high tax rates, Q falls so far that revenue collapses. In the extreme, a prohibitive tax stops all trade (Q = 0) and collects zero revenue. So revenue follows an inverted-U shape — it first rises then falls, reaching zero at a tax rate where no trades occur. This is the Laffer curve.
Question 6
A tax on sellers and a tax on buyers of the same size will result in
Hint
Tax incidence is determined by elasticities, not by the legal assignment. A tax creates the same wedge whether placed on buyers or sellers — the market adjusts to reach the same outcome.
ExplanationTax equivalence: It doesn't matter which side of the market is legally required to pay — the final outcome (equilibrium quantity, buyer price, seller price, and how the burden is shared) is identical. A $10 tax on sellers shifts the supply curve up by $10. A $10 tax on buyers shifts the demand curve down by $10. Both create the same wedge and the same result. Burden sharing depends on relative elasticities, not on legal incidence.
Part 3
True or False
Question 7
Deadweight loss from a tax represents money that the government collects but does not return to society.
Hint
Think about what deadweight loss actually is. Is it money the government has, or is it something that never exists in the first place?
ExplanationFalse. Deadweight loss is NOT money the government collects — it is gains from trade that never materialize. These are transactions that would have been mutually beneficial but don't happen because the tax makes them unprofitable. Tax revenue (areas B + D in Figure 8-1) does go to the government and can be used for public goods. The DWL (areas C + E) is pure economic waste — it helps nobody.
Question 8
If the supply of a good is perfectly inelastic, a tax on that good creates no deadweight loss.
Hint
If supply is perfectly inelastic, quantity supplied is fixed regardless of price. What happens to quantity traded when the tax is imposed? If ΔQ = 0, what is DWL = ½T×ΔQ?
ExplanationTrue. With perfectly inelastic supply, sellers produce the same quantity no matter what price they receive. When a tax is imposed, quantity supplied doesn't change, so quantity traded stays at Q* and ΔQ = 0. Since DWL = ½ × T × ΔQ = ½ × T × 0 = $0. The tax is entirely borne by sellers (the supply curve is vertical, so sellers absorb the full tax), but no trades are destroyed.
Question 9
Doubling a tax rate always doubles the tax revenue collected.
Hint
Revenue = T × Q. When T doubles, what happens to Q? Does Q stay constant?
ExplanationFalse. Revenue = T × QT. When T doubles, QT falls (higher tax reduces quantity traded). So revenue doesn't simply double — it increases by less than double (and eventually decreases). In our gasoline example: at T = $10, Revenue = $75; at T = $20, Revenue = $100 (not $150). At very high tax rates, revenue falls toward zero. This is exactly the Laffer curve insight.
Question 10
A tax placed on sellers has a different economic effect on buyers and sellers than a tax of the same size placed on buyers.
Hint
Think about tax equivalence. A tax on sellers shifts supply up; a tax on buyers shifts demand down. Does it matter which curve shifts?
ExplanationFalse. This is the principle of tax equivalence. A tax on sellers and an equal tax on buyers produce identical outcomes: the same wedge between Pb and Ps, the same reduction in quantity, the same DWL, and the same distribution of the burden between buyers and sellers. The legal incidence (who writes the check) doesn't determine the economic incidence (who really pays). That depends only on relative elasticities.